University of Maine at Augusta Admissions Costs More

Seizing the Day in Robert Herrick’s poem, “To the...

To what extent may an argument be framed as believable or serious? Persuasion on seizing the day is a common theme in Robert Herrick’s poem, â€Å"To the Virgins, To Make Much of Time† and Andrew Marvel’s â€Å"To His Coy Mistress†. The arguments within the poems can seem unrealistic, a little hyperbolic, with an underlying intent to acquire a woman to sleep with them. The concrete position of all the arguments within the two poems seems to be, getting a woman to sleep with them. The two poets posses similarities between the two pieces of poetry, however argue the topics in different ways. Beauty is not forever lasting, coyness put aside, while pleasure embraced, and time is of the essence; are all points made to intrigue women to be with them. To focus on those points a little: The beauty of a woman is compared to aspects of nature. Herrick’s poem only looks at the physical qualities of a woman, unlike Marvel’s, which references pers onality along with physical traits. Sexual passion embraced, and coyness set aside? The poets, both urge women to act upon sexual urges while they stay youthful, but if a woman was told they are not going to be desired when older, would they actually want to be with someone who tells them that? Time is moving quickly and its made known within the poems. Herrick is an advocate to relate everything to physical aspects, so of course he says a woman’s beauty diminishes quickly. Marvel does not relate beauty and time together, instead he would

Political Economy Sustaining Culture and Seeking †MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Political Economy Sustaining Culture and Seeking. Answer: Introduction Tourism in the contemporary times has occupied the second position in terms of leading the worlds economic condition by ensuring maximum global earning after that of the oil industry. Tourism accounts for over $300 billion which is approximately 25% of the worlds total GNP. The worlds fastest growing sector is identified to be the tourism sector in terms of economy recording an average rate of 7.1 per cent development in the annual manner. Despite having such statistically strength in terms of growth it seems tourism in many countries is still an apparently more vulnerable sector for getting affected through political turmoils (Bunakov et al. 2015, p.39). Tourism is a sector that has to deal with various affairs taking place in the diverse regions of the world hence also has the equal amount of vulnerability to get impinged by consequences related this aspect. The issues of political instability that may take place within and between the states becomes highly relevant as determining factors for imaging of the destinations before generating tourism plans in a particular region. These fall into the basic requisites for the organisers of the tourism sector to ensure maximum safety and security of the tourists. By the term political instability it clearly delineates the conditional state of the country in which the government and the operations conducted by them undergo severe instability or periodic disruptions. Political instability surrounds a wide range of multidimensional and complex aspect suggesting lack of control and social-order resulting in overall unsteadiness within the country (Mowforth and Munt, 2015, p.45). Some among the extreme conditions or events that lead to political instability as the automatic consequence are civil wars, terrorism attacks, political and social strikes and conditions of unrest. Tourism in the recent times has eventually gained a position that is led and associated with governmental intervention. Major events taking place in the varied regions have significantly affected the tourism sector to not only cause threat but have to bare heavy losses due to political unrest conditions. The relationship between the tourism sector and politics might not the supreme focal pint of the political parties and elections but it does have a significant role to play within the sector concerned. The necessity of the political intervention through the formulation of policies lies fundamentally due to integration of economic, cultural and intellectual benefits. This sort of amalgamations are required in this sector as an essential requisite to collectively bind the people, destinations and countries for the purpose of improving the global standard of living (Causevic and Lynch, 2013, p.153). Peace and prosperity are the primary responsibilities of the political powers throughout the world. It is necessary to understand the relevance of the political role before taking any nation into consideration for the intension of travel. Moreover, it is evident that the political aspects are closely interwoven with that of the economic aspects of the specific country to be travelled (Yang e t al. 2013, p.90). Tourism instead of being treated as an extension to the politics must rather be considered as a strong tool to be used to bring economy for political requirements. By strengthening the tourism sector a political power of a nation shall enable to obtain a better position in terms of GDP contribution for that nation. Having said that, the tourism sector has in the recent times has flourished so much that it is impracticable for the government to ignore the tourism activities from their sphere of interest. The government that shoulders responsibilities regrading evolving the pattern and pace of the overall economic ongoing of the nation needs to be conscious regarding the activities of tourism sector as well. There is a rather active participation noticed on the part of the government with respect to restore the faith in terms of feelings safe to travel to diverse nations across the world (McDowell et al. 2013, p.299). The tourism policies are made to concentrate upon the ways and means by which decision shall be taken by the governing bodies than merely analysing the issues. This step has evidently proved a considerable effort coming from both the public as well as the private sectors for acknowledging the nature of tourism with serious relevance. On analysing the influences of political instability upon tourism sector a number of events can be noted for posing negative consequences over the tourists and their practices of travel. Some of such events are discussed below: Political violence leading to create political crisis situation Beijing has in the recent past witnessed forceful suppression of the student protests by the Chinese authorities. The civilian population residing in these areas were threatened in a big way with the help of military tanks. This event gained the attention of audiences throughout the world as striking the prime news covers on an international podium. The consequence of which led to ruin the image of Chinese government in terms of international impression (Wan and Bramwell, 2015, p.320). Beijing had encountered heavy losses in terms of tourism sector due to the negative opinions that people tended to grow towards the government of the region. A similar picture reflecting instance of political violence was generated due to the consequence of martial law declared upon Tibetan civilians. A situation of turmoil triggered through nationalist unrest was inflicted upon innocent public. The event of killing a foreigner at Kathmandu due to their initiative to capture the pro-democratic demonstration situation led to heavy suffering for the Tibetan tourism industry. Impact of terrorism upon tourism industry The Maoist group is one of the strongest terrorist clans who pledged to free the Peru from foreign influences. The existing Peruvian institutions were potentially replaced with revolutionary regimes. However, in their mission to free the Peru from foreign grievances, they have attacked severely. These attacks have caused significant loss in terms of income and socio-cultural aspects upon the international visitors (Becken et al. 2015, p.441). This event has affected the tourism sector in a large-scale causing big time setback. Terrorist attacks were evidently observed within Turkey as well when political group composed of Marxist-Leninist approach tried to initiate an independent Marxist state within the Southern Turkey. The local government operating in those regions had notified the foreign tourist companies to prohibit tourists from reaching their grounds (Shkurkin et al. 2016, p.14). They had attacked the tourists by bombing them in the various hotels and by kidnapping them (Farmaki et al. 2015, p.180). They evidently confronted a significant drop of 8 per cent of foreign visitors in accordance with the arrival reports since the date of the attacks taken place inj these affected regions. The state of increasing political instability has resulted in creating a negative portrayal of the countries due to the active broadcast of selective information conducted by the responsibility of the media. The potential prospect of the tourism sector of that country has automatically experienced a shattering effect. The emerging conflict between the two strongly opposing poles of South and North Korea has led to severe damage to not only property but loss of innocent lives (Avraham, 2015, p.230). The Soviet missile had shot down large number of unarmed Korea civilians due to the dominance of the North Korea upon the South regions. The South Korean students rebelled to voice their protest against the attack inflicted upon them. These events led to a sequence of consequent related events that kept the agony alive thus making the political spectrum open to great state of instability. Tourism sector often treated as a tool for political accomplishments For the purpose of projecting their own countries surrounded with a positive image and construct themselves strongly against others the government started treating tourism as a political weapon. Governments operating in the varied countries discovered the fact that political pressure channelised through this measure can prove beneficial for them (Voll and Mosedale, 2015, p.100). During the period where Philippines in order to proclaim themselves as independent freed themselves from the governance of the United States, the following election evidenced an unsteady state of the political condition. Philippines have faced issues in terms of economic, political and natural disasters after taking such a decision. Marcos then generated the thought that tourism sector must be given utmost prevalence to ensure greater economic conditions for their state. Marcos has incorporated new regime programs in order to revive Philippines from the crisis to get worsen. They started manipulating the tour ism prospects by developing that sector with utmost prevalence (Yang et al. 2014, p.1163). These practices were imbibed for the purpose of exploring better opportunities for conducting business. Conclusion Political unsteadiness is that variable which is critically entwined with the security of the particular region. However an accumulation of negative practices that tends to generate political instability pose greater risk regrading the perception of the destination in the minds of the tourists. Tourists plan to travel in search for obtaining the serenity, safety, leisure and comfort that they lack in their daily course of life (Salamey, 2015, p.120). However, if they are unable to seek the same in the destination presumed to be travelled due to such instable conditions it is obvious to mark that destination as a troubled nation. Political intrusion leading to manipulation at times may become misleading and disadvantageous for their region itself. It must be kept in mind that tourists are highly sensitive to political instability. It is fault on the part of responsible tourism sector management to not include any kind of discussion related to impact of international politics upon the field of tourism. There is considerable number of evidences proclaiming the effects of political instability upon the tourism income generation process and causing negative social and cultural consequences. It is however most desirable to seek for political stability which holds a lot of relevance in terms of tourism investments. The tourism arrival record acts as a potential parameter to evaluate the level of safety developing an attracting perception among the people. The apprehension of the resulting risks and uncertainty is most likely to decrease the tourist arrivals thus influencing the tourism sector in a negative direction. The government travel advisory seems to have a growing influence upon the choice and preference of the destination made by the travellers. Just as political power has significant negative impact upon tourism sector, they need to take the responsibility to restrict people from travelling to risk prone or war afflicted regions. Reference list Avraham, E., 2015. Destination image repair during crisis: Attracting tourism during the Arab Spring uprisings.Tourism Management,47, pp.224-232. Becken, S., Zammit, C. and Hendrikx, J., 2015. Developing Climate Change Maps for Tourism: Essential Information or Awareness Raising?.Journal of Travel Research,54(4), pp.430-441. Bunakov, O.A., Zaitseva, N.A., Larionova, A.A., Chudnovskiy, A.D., Zhukova, M.A. and Zhukov, V.A., 2015. Research on the evolution of management concepts of sustainable tourism and hospitality development in the regions.Journal of Sustainable Development,8(6), p.39. Causevic, S. and Lynch, P., 2013. Political (in) stability and its influence on tourism development.Tourism Management,34, pp.145-157. Farmaki, A., Altinay, L., Botterill, D. and Hilke, S., 2015. Politics and sustainable tourism: The case of Cyprus.Tourism Management,47, pp.178-190. McDowell, G., Ford, J.D., Lehner, B., Berrang-Ford, L. and Sherpa, A., 2013. Climate-related hydrological change and human vulnerability in remote mountain regions: a case study from Khumbu, Nepal.Regional Environmental Change,13(2), pp.299-310. Mowforth, M. and Munt, I., 2015.Tourism and sustainability: Development, globalisation and new tourism in the third world. Routledge. Salamey, I., 2015. Post-Arab Spring: changes and challenges.Third world quarterly,36(1), pp.111-129. Shkurkin, D.V., Sogacheva, O.V., Logvencheva, E.S. and Khramova, M.N., 2016. Modernization of the Sphere of Tourist and Hospitality Industry of the South of Russia as a Growth Factor of Socio-economic Stability of the Region.International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues,6(1S). Voll, F. and Mosedale, J., 2015. Political-economic transition in Georgia and its implications for tourism in Svaneti.TIMS. Acta,9(2), pp.91-103. Wan, Y.K.P. and Bramwell, B., 2015. Political economy and the emergence of a hybrid mode of governance of tourism planning.Tourism Management,50, pp.316-327. Yang, J., Ryan, C. and Zhang, L., 2013. Social conflict in communities impacted by tourism.Tourism Management,35, pp.82-93. Yang, J., Ryan, C. and Zhang, L., 2014. Sustaining culture and seeking a Just Destination: Governments, power and tensiona life-cycle approach to analysing tourism development in an ethnic-inhabited scenic area in Xinjiang, China.Journal of Sustainable Tourism,22(8), pp.1151-1174.

World War II between Russia and Germany Essay Example Essay Example

World War II between Russia and Germany Essay Example Paper World War II between Russia and Germany Essay Introduction In August 1939 the world was surprised by the announcement of a nonaggression pact and trade agreement between Germany and the Soviet Union. This move, uniting two apparent enemies, gave Hitler the freedom to annex more territory in the east without fear of Soviet intervention. Secret clauses in the agreement divided Eastern Europe into German and Soviet spheres of influence and provided for the division of Poland between the two countries (Taylor 2005). Poland, aware of the significance of the German-Soviet pact, prepared to defend itself, and remained Britain and France of their promises to help it resist aggression. With Hitler becoming increasingly belligerent and tensions mounting, Europe braces itself for war. Despite the nonaggression pact with Hitler, Stalin remained wary of Germany’s military power and sought to secure the Baltic flank of the Soviet Union. In September and October, 1939, the tiny countries of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania were pressured by the Soviet Union into signing treaties that allowed Soviet troops to be stationed in their territories. The Soviet Union annexed those nations in 1940. On October 7, 1939, the Soviet demanded that Finland gave up land near Leningrad on the Karelian Isthmus (Taylor 2005), and grants the Soviets use of the Hango (or Hanko) naval base, and negotiations ended on November 30 when the Soviet invaded Finland. World War II between Russia and Germany Essay Body Paragraphs Thesis Statement: The purpose of this study is to scrutinize the World War II between Russia and Germany. II. Discussion A. Russian Campaign, 1941 Hitler considered the conquest of the Soviet Union to be a critical part of his plan to create a German empire. The great agricultural areas of the Soviet Union would provide room for German colonists, Russian mineral resources would be exploited for German industry, and Russian labor would be used in German factories (Remak 2006). The Soviet Union was also, in Hitler’s mind, an ideological enemy: Communism could never coexist with Nazism. Hitler’s invasion plan was called Barbarossa, after the nickname of the 12th-ceentury Holy Roman Emperor Frederick I. The plan called for launching three main thrusts into the Soviet Union, with immediate goals of taking Leningrad in the north, Moscow in the center, and Kiev and the Ukraine in the south. Hitler hoped that his troops could encircle large pockets of Soviet troops (Graff 2006) , as well as capture the main Soviet industrial and agricultural regions, and thus cause resistance to collapse before winter. The plan originally called for the attack to begin in May, 1941, but it was delayed until June by the need to secure the Balkans and Greece on Germany’s southern flank. This delay may have doomed the plan—had the Germans attacked according to the original schedule, they might have had the time to reach their objectives before the offensive was stalled by the severe Russian winter of 1941-42 (Michel 2004). On June 22, 1941, the massive blitzkrieg began. The Germans, led by Field Marshal Wilhelm von Leeb in the north, Field Marshal Fedor von Bock in the center, and Field Marshal Karl Rudolf Gerd von Rundstedt in the south, attacked with some 3,000,000 men and 19 panzer divisions. Actual tank strength—about 2,400—was approximately the same as that of the 10 panzer divisions used against France in 1940 (Liddell Hart 2001). Simultaneou sly with the German attack, the Finnish army struck near Leningrad, and the Romanian army crossed into the Ukraine and drove toward Odessa. B. Russian Campaign, 1942 Russian Winter Offensive. The Soviets’ success in stopping the Germans before Moscow encouraged them to stay on the offensive in early 1942. The Germans were ill equipped for cold weather, and the forward lines were so far from Germany that supplying the troops became increasingly difficult. The Soviets attacked to the north and south of Moscow, hoping to encircle and isolate the German army that faced the city (Dupuy 2003). The Soviet met with unexpected success and retook much ground, but suffered such heavy losses were also heavy, in part because Hitler refused to allow his troops to fall back to defensible positions. An offensive was also begun from the besieged city of Leningrad, but the Soviets made little progress there. The Russian offensive ended in late February, and both sides made plans for spring ope rations (Sulzberger 2000). German Spring Offensive. The German campaign opened in May. The main effort was made in the Caucasus, with the capture of its oil fields as a major objective. Sevastopol, in the Crimea, fell on July 1, after a long siege. A major attack that was opened on June 28 soon was extended along a 200-mile (320-km) front between the Don and Donets rivers. After reaching the vicinity of Voronezh, the armies turned south. Maikop, deep in the Caucasus, was reached on August 9. The Germans had outrun their supplies, however, and made little further progress (Remak 2006). C. Russian Campaign, 1943-44 German Retreat from the Caucasus. The surrender of the German Sixth Army at Stalingrad on February 2, 1943, left Hitler’s forces in the Caucasus in a perilous situation. Field Marshal General Paul Ludwig Kleist conducted a successful retreat while Field Marshal Erich von Mannstein held a corridor open for him at Roslov. The Russians then launched an offensive from Vo ronezh toward the Ukraine, and captured Kursk on February 14 and Kharkov on February 16 (Michel 2004). However, efforts to continue the advance into the Ukraine were repulsed by German counterattacks, and the Germans recaptured Kharkov on March 14. Battle of Kursk. The Battle of Kursk was the culmination of what was to be the last great German offensive against the Soviet Union. The German plan was to attack the north side of the Soviet salient around Kursk with Field Marshal Gunther von Kluge’s Ninth Army, and simultaneously push against the southern side of the salient with the Fourth Panzer Army, led by Mannstein. These two armies would then link up and destroy the trapped Soviets (Graff 2006). German delays gave the Soviets time to prepare powerful defenses within the salient and to being in more troops and equipment. The Soviet plan was to allow the Germans to batter themselves against the Soviet defenses until exhausted, and then strike back. The two sides committed a t otal of 6,000 tanks, 4,000 aircraft, and 2,000,000 men (Liddell Hart 2001). The German attack began on July 5. Gains were small and costly, as the Soviet defenses were well prepared and the Soviets possessed air superiority. The German troops in the north advanced only about six miles (10 km) before they were stopped; those in the south gained only 20 miles (32 km) in an entire week of hard fighting. The Battle of Kursk was the largest tank battle of the war, with as many as 3,000 tanks engaged at once. The German lost some 2,000 tanks in the course of the battle, a blow from which the once dreaded panzer armies never completely recovered (Liddell Hart 2001). The Soviets’ losses were nearly as high, but their tank production was sufficient to compensate for the losses. Russian Offensive. On July 12, the Soviets struck back, attacking the German salient around Orel, but Soviet troops struck in the south, advancing against Belgorod. Belgorod was taken on August 5, the same day that Orel was liberated. Kharkov was retaken for the lat time on August 23. It had changed hands four times and was in ruins. By September, Soviet armies under General Ivan S. Konev, Rodion Y. Malinovsky, and Fedor I. Tolbukhin were attacking all along the Dnieper River. On November 6, after heavy fighting t Dnepropetrovsk and Melitopol, the Germans were pushed back across the river. Kiev, capital of the Ukraine, was also recaptured on November 6. On the central front the Germans were driven out of Smonlensk on September 25, but the Russian drive could not be sustained, grinding to a halt some 100 miles (160 km) east of Minsk (Sulzberger 2000). On January 15, 1944, the Soviets launched a major offensive in the north. Soviet troops struck south in two prongs from besieged Leningrad, and at the same time attacked near Novgorod. The Soviet advance continued steadily and German casualties were high. By early March, the German armies had been forced back to Estonia and Latvia. On March 4 , 1944, a new Soviet offensive opened in the Ukraine. A series of thrusts soon left the Germans with only an uncertain foothold in the Soviet Union. Konev’s army reached the Romanian frontier before the end of the month, and Zhukov’s troops were at the border of Czechoslovakia on April 8. After the fall of Odessa two days later the Germans had little hope of holding any part of the Ukraine (Remak 2006). A Soviet drive into the Crimea resulted in the liberation of Sevastopol on May 9. D. Final Russian Campaign, 1944-45 The Soviet Union opened its summer campaign of 1944 on June 9 with an attack on Finland. The Mannerheim Line was broken on June 18 and Viipuri was captured. Finland signed an armistice on September 4. On the other hand, Hitler was convinced that the next great Soviet offensive would be in the south part of the Eastern Front, with goal of seizing the Balkan states and their important resources. Accordingly, he moved much of his strength away from the cente r of the front in Byelo-russia and put it in the south. The Soviets, however, were planning an attack in the center (Remak 2006). III. Conclusion As a conclusion, as the war drew to a close, the nations of the word were eager to find a means of attaining permanent peace. In 1945, the United Nations was established and its charter was signed by 51 countries. However, threats to the friendly settlement of postwar problems appeared even before the charter was signed. The Soviet Union, for example, had antagonized the United States and Great Britain by annexing the Baltic states. And by making extreme reparations demands upon Germany, Hungary, and Poland. After the war, the Soviets disagreed with the other Allies about the application of the agreements they had reached concerning the status of conquered and occupied territories. Although they had promised to allow self-determination for the people of the territories they had occupied, the Soviets brought most of the Balkan nations under Communist rule. They also supported rebels in Greece, turkey, and Iran, aided the Communist uprising in China, and closed off Eastern Europe—including the Soviet occupation zone of Germany— to the outside world. These actions led to a prolonged period of tension called the â€Å"cold war’ between the Western powers and the Soviet Union. Soviet-dominated Europe, said Winston Churchill, was separated from the rest of the world by an â€Å"iron curtain.† We will write a custom essay sample on World War II between Russia and Germany Essay Example specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on World War II between Russia and Germany Essay Example specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on World War II between Russia and Germany Essay Example specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer